Opportunity thesis

The market isn’t meetings. It’s trust.

Across research, consulting, investigations and public life, decisions rest on conversations that outsiders cannot check. ProofOfMeetProtocol gives human-sourced evidence a shareable, version-specific proof record.

The proposition: show that distinct people took part, when the session happened, and which version of the record each one endorsed. Not: certify that every statement is true.

03Distinct product jobsThree reasons to demand proof
05Strong opportunity areasIncluding three launch beachheads
15Customer segments mappedQualitative, not a claimed TAM

How to think about market size

Size the need for evidence, not the number of video calls.

A meeting is addressable when someone has a meaningful reason to verify its participants or its record. A credible market depends on three qualitative drivers.

Repetition

How often evidence is produced.

Consequence

The cost of a disputed or false record.

Third-party pull

Whether another party insists on proof.

01 · The product architecture

Three products hiding inside ProofOfMeetProtocol.

Each has a different buyer, a different reason to verify, and a different route to market. Hover, focus or tap a product to see the segments it can serve.

Important boundary: verified participation, acknowledgment of specific content, and agreement with its truth are three different claims. The product must never conflate them.

02 · Strongest opportunities

Five strong entry points. Three to pursue first.

Start with repeatable, client-facing evidence workflows. Grow into more sensitive and higher-stakes uses as trust, privacy and governance features mature.

01 · Frequency-ledLaunch wedge

Market research & UX

Paid interviews, panels and product research depend on real participants and trustworthy source records.

Buyer
Research agencies & product teams
Verifier
Corporate clients & product leaders
Market fit
High repeatability · clear project workflow
02 · Value-ledLaunch wedge

Consulting & due diligence

Recommendations and transactions are built on stakeholder conversations that clients rarely see first-hand.

Buyer
Boutique consultancies & diligence firms
Verifier
Clients, investors & acquirers
Market fit
Project-based · high evidence value
03 · Accountability-ledLaunch wedge

NGOs & impact evaluation

Field interviews and beneficiary consultations can become inspectable evidence behind donor-funded reports.

Buyer
NGOs & evaluation providers
Verifier
Funders, donors & evaluators
Market fit
Programmatic work · external accountability
04 · High-stakesExpansion

Audits & investigations

Witness and compliance interviews need trusted notes, version histories, corrections and controlled access.

Buyer
Investigators & compliance teams
Verifier
Audit committees, counsel & regulators
Market fit
Fewer records · higher consequence
05 · Trust-ledExpansion

Public consultation

People and oversight bodies want confidence that public input was actually received and represented fairly.

Buyer
Government & consultation providers
Verifier
Citizens, journalists & oversight bodies
Market fit
Institutional reach · longer sales cycles

A deliberate entry strategy

Win with simple proof of work. Earn the right to handle sensitive evidence.

Priorities are strategic hypotheses, not measured demand or verified willingness to pay.

03 · Market sizing logic

The addressable market widens with the proof layer.

The initial buyer is an evidence producer. The expansion buyer is an organisation governing sensitive records. Over time, verifiers and participants can demand proof regardless of which tool hosted the meeting.No speculative TAM: meeting counts, pricing and adoption are deliberately not fabricated. What matters first is paid, repeat behaviour in a narrow wedge.

Volume

Recurring proof at low friction

Studies, customer interviews and consultancy projects create repeat usage. A possible commercial model: per verified record or per project.

Value

High stakes raise value per record

Disputes, investigations and compliance cases may justify managed workspaces, permissions and enterprise contracts.

Distribution

Recipients become demand generators

A client, funder or participant who receives a verification page can ask other organisations for the same proof.

Infrastructure

From standalone product to integrations

APIs, embedded attestations and VerifyMyResearch evidence bundles can extend beyond a standalone meeting app.

04 · Capability-led expansion

Entry that follows the trust gradient.

Target the first three segments with a lightweight, repeatable verification flow, then add the safeguards adjacent markets need. The dated build sequence lives on the roadmap page.

  1. 01Launch · Prove the core

    Verify that the work happened

    Cubid-backed human-uniqueness signals, meeting time span, version fingerprints, participant attestations, proof pages and project-level evidence bundles.

    Initial three beachheads
    • Market research & UX
    • Consulting & due diligence
    • NGOs & impact evaluators
  2. 02Expand · Govern the record

    Add trusted case handling

    Private evidence rooms, fine-grained permissions, corrected or refused attestations, chain-of-custody logs, retention policies and exports.

    Unlock
    • Auditors & investigators
    • Legal & insurance cases
    • Recruiting & corporate governance
  3. 03Expand · Protect the participant

    Make participation provable

    Pseudonymous or restricted public proofs, accessibility, consent choices, multilingual review, right to reply and outcome-tracking links.

    Unlock
    • Government consultations
    • Clinical & sensitive interviews
    • Oral history & community work
  4. 04Scale · Embed the standard

    Meet users where they work

    APIs, integrations, white-label verification and portable evidence bundles across meetings and documents, without replacing existing tools.

    Extend to
    • Media & documentary production
    • Construction & field teams
    • Partner platforms & VerifyMyResearch

One foundation, increasing sophistication. The same core record, participants, time and endorsed version, serves each wave. Governance, consent, privacy and interoperability decide which markets are safe to enter next.

05 · Complete segment map

The full opportunity surface.

Fifteen plausible customer groups, organised by their primary need. Filter by product proposition to see how one verification foundation serves different buyers.

Showing 15 of 15 groups
SegmentPrimary productPotential buyerIndependent verifierEntry wave
Market research agenciesAResearch agencyCorporate client01 · Launch
UX researchers & product teamsAProduct organisationProduct leadership or sponsor01 · Launch
Management consultantsAConsulting firmClient or board01 · Launch
Auditors & compliance investigatorsBAudit or compliance teamCommittee or regulator02 · Govern
NGOs & development organisationsACProgramme or evaluation teamDonor, evaluator or beneficiary01 · Launch
Government consultation teamsCPublic agencyCitizen or oversight body03 · Protect
Due diligence firmsADiligence providerInvestor or acquirer01 · Launch
Recruiters & background-check firmsBRecruiting or screening firmEmployer02 · Govern
Documentary filmmakers & podcastersABProduction teamPublisher or distributor04 · Embed
Corporate governance teamsBCorporate secretaryBoard or auditors02 · Govern
Insurance claims investigatorsBInsurer or adjusterClaims reviewer or counsel02 · Govern
Clinical trial & healthcare teamsBCStudy sponsor or care providerMonitor or ethics reviewer03 · Protect
Real estate & construction professionalsBProject or inspection teamOwner, contractor or insurer04 · Embed
Oral historians & archivistsACMuseum or archiveFuture researcher or community03 · Protect

AWork provenanceBVersion-specific record endorsementCAcknowledged participation

* Possible evidentiary relevance does not imply court admissibility or regulatory compliance.

What investors should ask next

A broad market is a thesis. Repeated paid usage is proof.

This page qualifies the opportunity without inventing meeting counts, TAM or pricing. Customer discovery should test the economic hypotheses directly.

  • Will organisations pay when clients or funders can independently verify interview evidence?
  • Can participants complete a clear, consent-based attestation without slowing the meeting workflow?
  • Does one successful project lead to recurring use, client requests, and multi-meeting evidence bundles?

Signals of existing demand for verifiable evidence

These references show adjacent verification, accountability and consent practices. They are not estimates of ProofOfMeetProtocol’s market size or evidence of product-market fit.

Market opportunity brief · November 2026 · Strategic hypotheses, not financial projections.

Test the thesis with us.

If you buy, verify or fund work that rests on conversations, we want to hear which of the three jobs matters to you and why. We reply personally.

Your email and name are stored encrypted and used only to reply to you. No newsletters, no sharing.